Building Regional Connectivity Key to China’s ‘Silk Route’ Projects

SilkRoute

 Analysis by Kalinga Seneviratne

 

BANGKOK (IDN) – China is keen to demonstrate that its ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative, dubbed the “New Silk Route” by the media, is not geared to exclusively serve China’s economic interests, but to build connectivity in the region and beyond for the benefit of all.

This was the message from a high-powered Chinese team taking part in a ‘side-event’ organised by China at the 72nd UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) sessions here May 17-19. It is also an idea that ESCAP is strongly endorsing as it embarks on promoting a new development paradigm for the region.

In an opening address to the event, China’s Deputy Foreign Minister Qian Hongshan said that the ‘Belt’ is designed “to form synergy between the development strategies of various countries, draw on their respective strengths and unleash the huge development potential of this region to achieve common progress”.

He said more than 70 countries and international organisations have expressed their readiness to take an active part in it and around 30 countries have reached cooperation agreements with China. “(China) aims to forge partnerships through dialogue and discussion with a focus on connectivity,” he told the audience of ministers and senior officials from Asia and the Pacific.

More than two millennia ago, the diligent and courageous people of Eurasia (Central Asia) explored and opened up several routes of trade and cultural exchanges that linked the major civilisations of Asia, Europe and Africa, which was collectively called the ‘Silk Road’ by later generations. In October 2013, Chinese President Xi Jingping invoked this spirit of adventure and civilisational connectivity to propose the building of the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road.

Now known as the ‘One Belt, One Road’ (OBOR) initiative, China is currently aggressively embarking on turning it from a vision into action. In April 2016, China and ESCAP signed a Letter of Intent on promoting regional connectivity under this initiative. It will bring together ESCAP’s own initiatives in promoting the Trans-Asia Railway Network, the Inter-Government Agreement on the Asian Highway Network and the Inter-Government Agreement on Dry Ports.

“The Belt and Road will bring a range of socio-economic benefits to rural and under-served areas in China, as well as to its neighbours in Central Asia, Southeast Asia and beyond,” said Dr Shamshad Akther, executive secretary of ESCAP in an address to the seminar. “(The Initiative) is premised on the right principles, as an inclusive and substantive initiative with respect for national sovereignty,” she added.

“The ‘Belt’ aims at promoting a multimodal network, connecting road and rail routes with seaports, expanding fuel transportation networks through oil and gas pipelines, transforming regional power grids and extending ITC fibre optic links from China through Central Asia to ultimately reach Europe,” noted Dr Akther.

However, she sounded a note of caution pointing out that at least 10,000 km of the Asian Highway Network needs upgrading, while cross-border trade need multilateral regulatory frameworks to iron out bottlenecks at border crossings and ports for regional trade, and development should not be driven by natural resource extraction with minimal social and environmental concerns which, she said, “are intrinsically unsustainable.”

The Chinese government has drawn up the vision and action plan to jointly build the OBOR and has allocated massive financial resources to the project, including the setting up of the Asian Infrastructure Investments Bank (AIIB), a 40 billion dollar Silk Route Fund and a New Development Bank. The available capital from these institutions is designed to help leverage private investors and lenders to contribute to the required infrastructure financing.

The initiative proposes to build six economic corridors linking China through Southeast Asia, South and Central Asia to Iran, Turkey and Europe – through both land and sea.  Another will link China via Mongolia to Russia.

Speaking at the seminar, Russia’s ambassador to Thailand Kirill Barsky explained how the link via Mongolia will bring together the Eurasian Economic Community – which Russia is developing with its Central Asian neighbours – with East and Southeast Asia. “If we can join hands it will create a bright future for all,” he said.

Mongolia, which organised a side-event of its own on the same topic, expressed strong enthusiasm for the project as a land-locked country. Mongolia’s State Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Gankhuyag Damba said that in July 2015 Russia, China and Mongolia signed a Memorandum of Understanding to develop connectivity among the three countries. “A landlocked country like Mongolia has a historic opportunity to link our economies,” he said.

Manlaibayar Yondon, Director-General of the Department of Economic Cooperation in Mongolia, pointed out that this project brought together the presidents of the three countries for a summit in September 2014 and another was held last year. He pointed out that such meetings have never happened before.

Yondon explained that in 2011 Mongolia had the highest GDP growth rate in the world of 17 percent due to its mining sector activities, where 68 percent of the exports went to China. But the drop in commodity prices and China’s economic downturn brought its GDP growth down to 2.3 percent last year.

“We need to diversify our economy and this (OBOR) initiative will help us to adjust our policies to meet the needs of China and Russia to expand our economy,” he said. Through three rail connections, road networks and power lines, Mongolia hopes to benefit to reach third markets via the two giant neighbours.

Susan Stone, Chief of the Trade and Investment Division of ESCAP, warned that the ability of OBOR to expand trade to a wider area depends on the policy environment. “Policy and regulatory environment must be matched with infrastructure expansion,” she argued.

AIIB’s Wang Yanning said that the region is not necessarily short of cash because the saving rate is very high.  What is needed is to mobilise these savings resources. “This bank was created so that China can share its economic success with the region,” he said. “There is a huge infrastructure gap in the region.”

One of the participants in the seminar, Afghanistan’s Economics Minister Abdul Sattar Murad, warned that his region is observing a high degree of insecurity and “if the security situation is not controlled all these efforts will impeded.” Nevertheless, he pointed out, economic corridors are being built with neighbouring Tajikistan to China and Iran, but he called on Russia and China to build security cooperation into this project.

“We need to counter terrorism and security,” agreed Shen Bing of the Academy of Microeconomic Research in China. ”In the China-Pakistan economic corridor project, it includes security cooperation.” (IDN-InDepthNews – 25 May 2016)

Advertisements

Author: lotuscommnet

Dr Kalinga Seneviratne, who was born and educated in Sri Lanka has spent 20 years in Australia and is currently based in Singapore. He is a journalist, a radio broadcaster, television documentary maker, media analyst and an international communications lecturer. Currently Kalinga teaches Asian regional media systems and journalism and news media at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. From 2004 to 2012 he was the Head of the Research division at the Asian Media Information and Communication Centre (AMIC) in Singapore. He has also taught international communications at the University of Technology Sydney and Macquarie University (Australia). He has authored and edited many books on media and communications issues. His expertise are in development communication, journalism and feature writing, community radio and alternative media, and international communications. He has won an United Nations Media Peace Award (1987) and the Inaugural Singapore Airlines Educational Award (1992) from the Community Broadcasting Association of Australia for services to the Australian community radio sector. He was the Australian and South Pacific correspondent for the Inter Press Service (IPS) news agency from 1991-1997 and still writes for them IDN IN-Depth News on a freelance basis. He has done reporting assignments for IPS from a number of countries in Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Kalinga was a member of a research team from 1991-1993 at the University of Technology Sydney looking at ‘Cultural Diversity and Racism in the Media’ in Australia. Kalinga is still a practicing journalists who writes for many publications across Asia and also produce radio and television documentaries.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s